Pickup Trucks That Gearheads Love To Hate

Pickup Trucks That Gearheads Love To Hate


October 17, 2025 | Allison Robertson

Pickup Trucks That Gearheads Love To Hate


When Tough Just Wasn’t Enough  

Not every truck earns the respect of the enthusiast crowd. Some fail with underpowered engines, awkward styling, or mechanical nightmares that still haunt used buyers today. From design flops to engineering missteps, these pickups are the ones that gearheads love to roast.

Truck Hate Msn

Advertisement

#25 – Chevrolet Avalanche

The Avalanche had potential—a full-size Chevy truck with SUV comfort—but gearheads hated its soft suspension and plastic body panels. Its 5.3L V8 (285 hp) wasn’t terrible, but the styling divided fans, and its utility didn’t justify its weight or price. A jack-of-all-trades that mastered none.

File:1st Chevrolet Avalanche.jpgIFCAR, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

#24 – Honda Ridgeline (First Generation)

While practical, the first-gen Ridgeline offended purists with its unibody design and minivan underpinnings. The 3.5L V6 (250 hp) couldn’t tow like traditional body-on-frame rivals. Gearheads mocked its car-like handling and lack of true off-road grit. It was built for comfort—not credibility.

File:Honda-Ridgeline.jpgIFCAR, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

#23 – Dodge Dakota (2005–2011)

By the late 2000s, the Dakota lost its edge. Despite a 4.7L V8 option, it couldn’t compete with the growing midsize competition. Cheap interiors, poor reliability, and uninspired styling made enthusiasts feel Dodge had abandoned its once-proud workhorse.

Dodge Dakota2011 Dodge Dakota | Only 15k miles | St#1005SP, Nemer Motor Group

Advertisement

#22 – Ford Explorer Sport Trac

Ford tried to blend SUV and truck, but the result was neither fish nor fowl. The 4.0L V6 (210 hp) struggled under its own weight, and towing maxed out at 5,300 lbs. Gearheads hated its compromised design and awkward proportions.

File:Ford Explorer Sport Trac 4x4 Black 01.jpgEthan Llamas, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

#21 – Chevrolet SSR

On paper, a retro-styled convertible pickup with a V8 should’ve been fun. In reality, the SSR’s heavy chassis and underwhelming performance killed the vibe. Even with 390 hp in later models, its 4,700-pound weight and strange design made it more showpiece than speed machine.

File:2005 Chevrolet SSR, front right, 06-15-2024.jpgMercurySable99, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

#20 – GMC Canyon (2004–2012)

The first-gen Canyon was underpowered and cheaply built. Its inline-5 engine (220 hp) confused enthusiasts and lacked the torque expected from a truck. Sloppy steering, weak towing, and reliability issues earned it few fans among truck lovers.

File:2-Door GMC Canyon.jpgBull-Doser, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

#19 – Ford Maverick (Hybrid)

Although efficient, the Maverick Hybrid’s 2.5L engine (191 hp) and CVT make it feel more like an appliance than a pickup. Enthusiasts bash it for its lack of grunt, plasticky interior, and car-like demeanor. Gearheads want torque—not fuel economy bragging rights.

Ford Maverick (Hybrid)Ford Maverick Hybrid: Good Design does not cost extra., MotoManTV

Advertisement

#18 – Dodge Ram 1500 EcoDiesel (Early Models)

The EcoDiesel sounded great on paper—V6 torque and fuel savings—but early versions suffered from emissions issues and expensive failures. Enthusiasts quickly grew tired of the reliability headaches, especially when turbo and EGR problems started appearing before 100K miles.

 Dodge Ram 1500 EcoDiesel 2014 Ram 1500 3.0L EcoDiesel V6 Review, AutoGuide.com

Advertisement

#17 – Chevrolet Colorado (First Generation)

Introduced in 2004, the Colorado promised to replace the S-10 but fell short. Its 3.5L inline-5 engine (220 hp) was rough and weak, and interior quality was poor. Gearheads felt it was a half-hearted effort from GM—especially compared to Toyota’s Tacoma.

File:2010 Chevrolet Colorado -- NHTSA.jpgU.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

#16 – Toyota Tundra (2014–2021 5.7L V8)

While powerful (381 hp), the Tundra’s 5.7L V8 guzzled gas and dated tech made it feel ancient by 2020. Its six-speed transmission lagged behind rivals, and poor ride comfort made long trips tiring. Enthusiasts hate that Toyota let this once-strong contender stagnate.

Toyota Tundra2021 Tundra Overview | Toyota, Toyota USA

Advertisement

#15 – Ford F-150 (2004–2008 5.4L Triton)

A nightmare engine for mechanics. The 5.4L Triton V8 was notorious for spark plug blowouts and timing chain tensioner failures. Despite Ford’s popularity, this generation became infamous in garages everywhere. Gearheads still cringe at the thought of extracting those seized plugs.

Ford F-150 Should you buy a 2004-2008 F150? Watch this!, Just King Adrian

Advertisement

#14 – Nissan Titan XD (Cummins Diesel)

The idea was brilliant: combine Cummins torque with Nissan comfort. The result? A confusing middleweight truck that did neither well. The 5.0L diesel suffered from reliability problems, transmission issues, and poor resale value. Enthusiasts called it a “solution in search of a problem.”

 Nissan Titan XD 2019 Nissan TITAN XD Cummins® V8 Turbo Diesel Engine, Nissan USA

Advertisement

#13 – Dodge Ramcharger (1999 Concept)

The 1999 Ramcharger concept should’ve been a home run but missed entirely. Oversized, oddly styled, and plagued with cheap interiors, it never caught on. Enthusiasts still roast it as one of Dodge’s strangest attempts to blend SUV and truck DNA.

File:Dodge Ram Charger 2005.jpgMontrose Patriot at English Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

#12 – Chevrolet Silverado 1500 (2019 Launch Models)

When the redesigned Silverado arrived in 2019, gearheads were disappointed. The 5.3L and 6.2L V8s performed well, but the dated interior, awkward front end, and rough ride compared to Ram killed its appeal. Even loyal Chevy fans admitted it missed the mark.

File:2019 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 à 4 portes.jpgBull-Doser, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

#11 – Jeep Gladiator (Base Models)

While off-road capable, the Gladiator feels overpriced and underpowered for the work it’s meant to do. The 3.6L Pentastar V6 (285 hp) lacks low-end torque, and towing capacity lags behind rivals. Enthusiasts joke it’s “a Wrangler that can’t decide what it wants to be.”

Jeep Gladiator (Base Models)2022 Jeep Gladiator Sport S: Is The Base Model Gladiator Still Affordable?, Ben Hardy

Advertisement

#10 – Lincoln Blackwood

Luxury meets impracticality. The Blackwood had a fancy interior but a useless carpeted bed and rear-wheel-drive only. Its 5.4L V8 wasn’t bad, but the high price and lack of truck function made it an epic fail. Enthusiasts still laugh at its “pickup for people who don’t haul.”

File:2002 Lincoln Blackwood Pick-Up (7811317090).jpgGreg Gjerdingen from Willmar, USA, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

#9 – Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Hybrid

GM’s early hybrid Silverado used a weak electric assist system that barely improved fuel economy. The 5.3L V8 (295 hp) was fine, but the system’s complexity and high price turned off enthusiasts. Gearheads hated its fake “green truck” gimmick that offered no real performance gain.

Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Hybrid2010 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Hybrid Overview, WheelsTV Test Drives

Advertisement

#8 – Dodge Ram 1500 (2002–2008)

Stylish but flawed, this era of Ram suffered from poor build quality and electrical gremlins. The 5.7L HEMI had power, but front suspension failures and interior wear made ownership a headache. Enthusiasts saw it as beauty without backbone.

File:2006-2008 Dodge Ram 1500 -- 03-16-2012.JPGIFCAR, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

#7 – Toyota Pickup (1990s V6 Models)

While older Toyotas were bulletproof, the 3.0L V6 (“3VZ-E”) in early ‘90s trucks was not. It had head gasket failures, low power (150 hp), and poor fuel economy. Enthusiasts love Toyota’s legacy—but this engine nearly tarnished it.

File:1990 Toyota Pickup 08-22-2019.jpgSsmIntrigue, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

#6 – Ford Ranger (2019–2022)

The Ranger’s long-awaited return fell flat for enthusiasts. Its 2.3L EcoBoost (270 hp) was peppy, but the truck felt cramped and plasticky. The ride was harsh, and the steering numb. Fans expected a reborn mini F-150—but got an overpriced global rebrand.

Ford Ranger2020 Ford Ranger // Is THIS the BEST VALUE in Mid-Size Trucks??, Car Confections

Advertisement

#5 – Dodge Dakota R/T (1998–2003)

Despite its 5.9L Magnum V8 (250 hp), the Dakota R/T was more bark than bite. Poor handling, terrible gas mileage, and limited aftermarket tuning made it a poser in muscle truck clothing. Enthusiasts expected a baby Lightning—what they got was disappointment.

File:2000 Dodge Dakota R-T Pick-Up (34301885784) (cropped).jpgGreg Gjerdingen from Willmar, USA, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

#4 – GMC Hummer EV Pickup

At over 9,000 pounds, the Hummer EV defies logic. Despite mind-blowing 1,000 hp specs, its price, weight, and massive battery footprint make it a target for ridicule. Enthusiasts see it as over-engineered excess masquerading as innovation.

File:GMC Hummer EV Pickup Washington DC Metro Area, USA.jpgOWS Photography, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

#3 – Chevrolet Silverado EV WT

Chevy’s electric work truck promised power but delivered range anxiety and a $70K sticker. Enthusiasts balk at its weight, uninspired design, and software-heavy focus. Gearheads want torque and noise—not an electric appliance with a bowtie.

File:2024 Silverado EV WT.jpgKaundike, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

#2 – Tesla Cybertruck

Few vehicles have divided the automotive world like the Cybertruck. Its stainless steel panels, unfinished feel, and unpredictable rollout infuriate traditional truck fans. Even with wild performance claims, gearheads see it as a tech experiment, not a true truck.

File:2024 Tesla Cybertruck Foundation Series IMG 0620.jpgAlexander-93, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

#1 – Ford F-150 Lightning

While groundbreaking, the F-150 Lightning alienates old-school truck fans. The instant torque is impressive, but towing range collapse and charging downtime make it impractical for real work. Gearheads love to hate it as the symbol of trucks losing their “tough” soul to technology.

File:Ford F-150 Lightning CRI 05 2023 3639.jpgMariordo (Mario Roberto Duran Ortiz), Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

You May Also Like:

Pickup Trucks With The Worst Depreciation, According To Industry Experts
Why Pickup Trucks Are More Popular Than Ever
The Worst Pickup Trucks In The Last 20 Years, According To Industry Experts

Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5


READ MORE

Pontiac GTO

America’s First Muscle Car Is Still The Most Legendary

The Pontiac GTO didn’t just join the muscle car movement, it helped kick the whole thing into motion. In the early 1960s, the GTO became a blueprint for muscle culture: big engines, bold identity, and the kind of street performance that made the car feel alive.
February 4, 2026 Quinn Mercer
Historic Ford Icons

Legendary Ford Vehicles From The '60s and '70s

The automotive landscape of the 1960s and 1970s allowed manufacturers to experiment freely. Ford responded with distinctive vehicles that balanced power, style, and practicality, leaving behind memorable models that still resonate with enthusiasts decades later.
February 6, 2026 Marlon Wright
Internalfb Image

A Look Inside The Abandoned Packard Automotive Plant

Not many factories have made a big impact on American industry, but the Packard Plant in Detroit definitely has. It now stands as a reminder of how cars were made with top-notch craftsmanship and high standards.
February 5, 2026 Alex Summers
women standing before a car

Overlooked Cars That Are Actually Awesome

Some cars shout for attention the moment they arrive. Others sit quietly on dealer lots, blending in so well that most people never give them a second glance. This list is about those overlooked machines. Factory-built sleepers that carried serious performance, yet failed to spark mass interest when new.
January 29, 2026 Marlon Wright
Studebaker Avanti

The Studebaker Avanti Was Too Advanced For Its Time, But Now It’s One Of America’s Best Cult Classics

When the Avanti debuted in the early 1960s, it didn’t look like anything else on American roads. It wasn’t trying to follow trends—it was trying to leap over them. Unfortunately, the world wasn’t quite ready for what Studebaker was selling.
January 26, 2026 Quinn Mercer